What would you do?

One example of the use of constructivist methods can be found in preparing to learn a self-defense technique. Let's say I'm about to teach a technique where we learn how to defend when the bad guy grabs with both hands from the front and pulls in. What I do is demonstrate the attack, then have the students get into pairs or small groups.

I say "okay, grab each other and pull in. Take turns. When you are grabbing, I want you to think about why a bad guy would do this to someone. Also, think of what the bad guy might do next. When you are being grabbed, also think about why, think about what they are doing to you, and think about your options for defense. After a couple grabs, try some options out, both as bad guy and defender."

They do this, and seem to have fun doing it. It's a physical sort of pursuit; not much talking except to critique each other's results. After a couple minutes, I stop them and start asking what they found, giving each person a chance to explain what they think and also demonstrate on me or on their partner. In this manner, we come up with a few options for defense and also have a chance to critique and praise each other's ideas. I find people are most critical of their own ideas, usually. I try to apply the "expert" eye.

Then, I start teaching the self-defense combo / technique for that class. Almost always, someone has already come up with the first move, or a variation, so I can start with what that person did.

This practice is consistent with the recommendations of Ed Parker, Sr., the guy who developed American Kenpo. He said it is important to analyze self-defense from three perspectives -- the bad guy, the defender, and the 3rd person observer.

Peace,
SGB